1983 Dodge Charger vs. 1965 Morgan 4
To start off, 1983 Dodge Charger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Dodge Charger (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1965 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1965 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Dodge Charger weights approximately 410 kg more than 1965 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Charger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Dodge Charger | 1965 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Dodge | Morgan |
| Model | Charger | 4 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2450 mm |
