1983 Dodge Charger vs. 1981 Audi 4000
To start off, 1983 Dodge Charger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi 4000 (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Charger. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi 4000 should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Because 1981 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Dodge Charger (161 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1983 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Dodge Charger | 1981 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Audi |
| Model | Charger | 4000 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 161 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2550 mm |
