1983 Dodge Charger vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Charger. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (127 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Dodge Charger. (117 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Charger | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Charger | Megane |
Year Released | 1983 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |