1983 Dodge Charger vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Charger. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Dodge Charger. (161 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Charger | 2004 Mazda MX | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Charger | MX |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2760 mm |