1983 Dodge Charger vs. 2005 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Charger. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Dodge Charger. (117 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Charger | 2005 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
Model | Charger | Freelander |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 174 HP |
Torque | 117 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |