1983 Dodge Charger vs. 2006 Ford Ka
To start off, 2006 Ford Ka is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Dodge Charger (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ka. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ka weights approximately 70 kg more than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Dodge Charger (161 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ka. (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1983 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Charger | 2006 Ford Ka | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Charger | Ka |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2460 mm |