1983 Dodge Charger vs. 2009 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2009 Mercury Mariner is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Mariner (240 HP @ 6550 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Charger. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 875 kg more than 1983 Dodge Charger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mercury Mariner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Mariner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercury Mariner (302 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Dodge Charger. (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mercury Mariner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Dodge Charger. 2009 Mercury Mariner has automatic transmission and 1983 Dodge Charger has manual transmission. 1983 Dodge Charger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercury Mariner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Charger | 2009 Mercury Mariner | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Charger | Mariner |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6550 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 62 L |