1983 Dodge Charger vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Charger. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Dodge Charger. (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Charger | 2009 Renault Megane | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Charger | Megane |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |