1983 Dodge Charger vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Charger. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Charger | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Charger | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2490 mm |