1983 Dodge Daytona vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1983 Dodge Daytona is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Daytona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Dodge Daytona (143 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Daytona should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Dodge Daytona weights approximately 75 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Dodge Daytona | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Daytona | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 75 L |
