1983 Dodge Daytona vs. 1964 Humber Super Snipe
To start off, 1983 Dodge Daytona is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Dodge Daytona (146 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1964 Humber Super Snipe. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Daytona should accelerate faster than 1964 Humber Super Snipe.
Because 1964 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Dodge Daytona | 1964 Humber Super Snipe | |
| Make | Dodge | Humber |
| Model | Daytona | Super Snipe |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 87.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2800 mm |
