1983 Dodge Daytona vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1983 Dodge Daytona is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Daytona | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
Model | Daytona | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1983 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2760 mm |