1983 Dodge Daytona vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Daytona would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP) has 244 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Daytona. (146 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Daytona.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Daytona | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Daytona | Mustang |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 390 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2620 mm |