1983 Dodge Daytona vs. 2004 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Daytona would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Daytona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Dodge Daytona (146 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Daytona should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart.
Because 2004 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Dodge Daytona | 2004 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Dodge | MCC |
| Model | Daytona | Smart |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 81 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2370 mm |
