1983 Dodge Daytona vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Daytona would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Matrix (158 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Daytona. (146 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Daytona.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Daytona | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Daytona | Matrix |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 158 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2601 mm |