1983 Dodge Mirada vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Mirada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Mirada would be higher.
Because 1983 Dodge Mirada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Dodge Mirada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Dodge Mirada. (343 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Dodge Mirada.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Mirada | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Mirada | XU 6 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |