1983 Dodge Mirada vs. 2006 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Mirada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Mirada would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Mirada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 145 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Dodge Mirada weights approximately 325 kg more than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Because 1983 Dodge Mirada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Dodge Mirada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Dodge Mirada (343 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Croma. (203 Nm). This means 1983 Dodge Mirada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Mirada | 2006 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Dodge | Fiat |
Model | Mirada | Croma |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5210 cc | 2197 cc |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 203 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.3 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 94.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2830 mm |