1983 Dodge Omni vs. 2005 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2005 Holden Rodeo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Omni. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Omni.
Because 2005 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Dodge Omni. (118 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Dodge Omni.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge Omni | 2005 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Omni | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3060 mm |