1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 1996 Eagle Vision
To start off, 1996 Eagle Vision is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Eagle Vision (217 HP) has 107 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Donkervoort S7 | 1996 Eagle Vision | |
Make | Donkervoort | Eagle |
Model | S7 | Vision |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1430 mm |