1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger (182 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Donkervoort S7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger (270 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Donkervoort S7 | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Donkervoort | Mitsubishi |
| Model | S7 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 182 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1740 mm |
