1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 1998 Peugeot Tulip
To start off, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Donkervoort S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Donkervoort S7 (110 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Donkervoort S7 should accelerate faster than 1998 Peugeot Tulip.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (205 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 1998 Peugeot Tulip will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Donkervoort S7 | 1998 Peugeot Tulip | |
| Make | Donkervoort | Peugeot |
| Model | S7 | Tulip |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
