1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2000 Alfa Romeo 166
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 (226 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 (276 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 | |
| Make | Donkervoort | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | S7 | 166 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 226 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 276 Nm |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 237 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1420 mm |
