1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph (318 HP) has 208 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph (489 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph | |
Make | Donkervoort | Rolls-Royce |
Model | S7 | Silver Seraph |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5379 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 318 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 489 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1520 mm |