1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2002 BMW Z8
To start off, 2002 BMW Z8 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 4,939 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z8 (400 HP) has 290 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z8 should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Z8 (500 Nm) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2002 BMW Z8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7. 1983 Donkervoort S7 has automatic transmission and 2002 BMW Z8 has manual transmission. 2002 BMW Z8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Donkervoort S7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2002 BMW Z8 | |
Make | Donkervoort | BMW |
Model | S7 | Z8 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4939 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 400 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1320 mm |