1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2002 Mazda 6
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. Both 1983 Donkervoort S7 and 2002 Mazda 6 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (130 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 6 (188 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2002 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2002 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Donkervoort | Mazda |
| Model | S7 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 130 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 188 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1440 mm |
