1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Donkervoort S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Donkervoort S7 (110 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Donkervoort S7 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Donkervoort S7 (163 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (112 Nm). This means 1983 Donkervoort S7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart. 1983 Donkervoort S7 has automatic transmission and 2003 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 2003 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Donkervoort S7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Donkervoort | MCC |
Model | S7 | Smart |
Year Released | 1983 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 112 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1200 mm |