1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Donkervoort S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Donkervoort S7 (110 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Donkervoort S7 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Donkervoort S7 (163 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1983 Donkervoort S7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Donkervoort | MCC |
| Model | S7 | Smart |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 73 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1460 mm |
