1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2004 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (200 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (281 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2004 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Donkervoort | Ford |
| Model | S7 | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1420 mm |
