1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2004 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Donkervoort S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic (133 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic (200 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Renault Grand Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2004 Renault Grand Scenic | |
Make | Donkervoort | Renault |
Model | S7 | Grand Scenic |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 133 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 200 Nm |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1640 mm |