1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2004 Volvo S80
To start off, 2004 Volvo S80 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S80 (167 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S80 (230 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2004 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Donkervoort | Volvo |
Model | S7 | S80 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 230 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1440 mm |