1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Donkervoort S7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7. 1983 Donkervoort S7 has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Donkervoort S7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Donkervoort | Ford |
Model | S7 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 206 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 324 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1780 mm |