1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2006 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Smart ForTwo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Donkervoort S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Donkervoort S7 (110 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Donkervoort S7 should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Donkervoort S7 (163 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForTwo. (95 Nm). This means 1983 Donkervoort S7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2006 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Donkervoort | Smart |
| Model | S7 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1560 mm |
