1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo C70 (197 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo C70 (270 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2006 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Donkervoort | Volvo |
Model | S7 | C70 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1440 mm |