1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Donkervoort | Mazda |
Model | S7 | 6 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2488 cc |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 228 Nm |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 208 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1800 mm |