1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2010 Audi RS6
To start off, 2010 Audi RS6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 4,991 cc (10 cylinders), 2010 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi RS6 (572 HP) has 462 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 2010 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Donkervoort S7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi RS6 (650 Nm) has 487 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2010 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2010 Audi RS6 | |
| Make | Donkervoort | Audi |
| Model | S7 | RS6 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 572 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 650 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1460 mm |
