1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2012 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Donkervoort | Chevrolet |
Model | S7 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 182 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 233 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1760 mm |