1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2012 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2012 Ford Mondeo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. Both 1983 Donkervoort S7 and 2012 Ford Mondeo are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mondeo (113 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Mondeo (280 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2012 Ford Mondeo | |
| Make | Donkervoort | Ford |
| Model | S7 | Mondeo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 113 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 197 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1420 mm |
