1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2012 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Donkervoort S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Donkervoort S7 (110 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2012 Volkswagen Polo. (69 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Donkervoort S7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Volkswagen Polo.

Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Donkervoort S7 (163 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volkswagen Polo. (112 Nm). This means 1983 Donkervoort S7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volkswagen Polo. 1983 Donkervoort S7 has automatic transmission and 2012 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 2012 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Donkervoort S7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: