1983 Donkervoort S7 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP) has 156 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Donkervoort S7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Donkervoort S7 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Donkervoort | Cadillac |
Model | S7 | CTS |
Year Released | 1983 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 266 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 302 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1473 mm |