1983 Fiat 126 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat 126 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1983 Fiat 126. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat 126.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Fiat 126. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat 126. (42 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat 126.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat 126 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 126 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 650 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 42 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2840 mm |