1983 Fiat 127 vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1983 Fiat 127 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1983 Fiat 127. (49 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 112 kg more than 1983 Fiat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat 127. (77 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat 127.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat 127 | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | 127 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1048 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 77 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 942 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2210 mm |
