1983 Fiat Argenta vs. 2006 Ford E-250
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Argenta. (98 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Argenta | 2006 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Argenta | E-250 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 132 L |