1983 Fiat Argenta vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (304 HP) has 216 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Argenta. (88 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Argenta. (200 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Argenta | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
| Model | Argenta | CTS |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 304 HP |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 370 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2880 mm |
