1983 Fiat Argenta vs. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Argenta. (98 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Argenta | 2010 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Fiat | Chevrolet |
| Model | Argenta | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2858 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 71 L |
