1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 580 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
| Make | Fiat | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Ritmo | 6C |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 100 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 77 L |
