1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1942 Peugeot 202
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (129 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1942 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1942 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 165 kg more than 1942 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Peugeot 202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Peugeot 202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1942 Peugeot 202 | |
Make | Fiat | Peugeot |
Model | Ritmo | 202 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1132 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2460 mm |