1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1954 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (129 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1954 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | 12 M |
Year Released | 1983 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1620 mm |