1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Fiat | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ritmo | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3690 mm |
