1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1686 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Fiat | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Ritmo | Phantom |
Year Released | 1983 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 91.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 2591 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 6050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 104 L |