1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1962 Morgan 4
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,340 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Morgan 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (59 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 204 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1962 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Fiat | Morgan |
Model | Ritmo | 4 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2450 mm |